Sunday, January 16, 2022
HomeNewsPoliticsResident groups and politicians call for former housing boss to resign as...

Resident groups and politicians call for former housing boss to resign as councillor

Calls from irate residents and opposition councillors for Cllr Leo Pollak to resign as a councillor have so far been batted away by Southwark Labour’s leadership.

Last week it emerged that Cllr Pollak set up a Twitter account that argued with residents over Southwark Council housing schemes. He resigned from the Cabinet, but has stayed on as a ward councillor.

Lib Dem leader Nick Johnson has described Pollak’s position as ‘untenable’, with fellow group councillors Anood Al-Samerai blasting the account as a ‘propaganda machine’, and Humaira Ali saying she was ‘livid’. The Green Party’s former election candidate Claire Sheppard said the situation was ‘appalling’ and argued Pollak should also step down as a councillor.

This week Labour leader Kieron Williams gave no indication that Cllr Pollak would be asked to step down, telling the News: “The mistake made by Cllr Pollak has rightly led to him apologising to all those affected and resigning from his cabinet role.

“Whilst he primarily used this Twitter account to champion the building of new council homes, I am sorry to say that at times he went about that in a way that did not meet the high standards I expect of everyone in my cabinet; that is why I accepted his resignation as cabinet member for housing.

“It is a decision I made with a heavy heart, as I know his work delivering new and better council homes has transformed thousands of lives for the better. Having spoken to him at length, I know he is deeply and genuinely sorry for that mistake.

“I hope he will learn the lessons from this serious error as he continues to work hard to serve the residents in his ward.”

Lewis Shaffer, from the Save Priory Court campaign – who was dismissed by the ‘SouthwarkYIMBY’ account as a ‘serial blusterer’ said he believed Cllr Pollak should resign and called the council to pause the ‘infill’ plans that had ignited the war of words in the first place.

Although there is huge support for new council housing across the borough, the campaigner believes ultimately tenants will lose out the most through overdevelopment and higher density housing – in an already overcrowded borough and describes the schemes as an ‘overreaction’ to historic failings in estate redevelopments like the Heygate.

“Our main goal is to make people realise that infilling on council estates increases density and reduces amenities for estate residents.

“In Priory Court they want to build nine new homes, a small part of what is actually needed and there is land available elsewhere to do that.

“It’s just that building on council owned land already is seemingly easy.

“He argued that I don’t have support – but 47 out of 72 flats signed our petition.”

Cllr Pollak resigned and referred himself to the council’s monitoring officer over the Twitter account last week.

In an unequivocal public apology, he said he would accept whatever recommendations were made after an investigation.

The News attempted to contact Cllr Pollak this week, to ask whether he intended to resign as a ward councillor.

During Wednesday’s council assembly, he publicly apologised to colleagues and residents and gave the following speech: “I want to apologise to residents in Southwark, councillor and officer colleagues, and to the wider tenants movement, for using an unattributed twitter account to promote and defend council house-building, all communications from which should be regarded as from me personally.

“I have resigned from my role as a cabinet member because it is critically important that my mistakes don’t in any way impede the collective effort needed to provide new council homes that gives hope to so many thousands of people in our borough living in overcrowded and inadequate housing.

“I have attended countless meetings and walkabouts with residents about new homes projects and sought to engage directly with many groups in resolving issues with design, mitigating impacts and the establishing the wider resident benefit.

“On the whole, most people have always appreciated the urgency and imperative to build council homes in the borough, and I’m always grateful for the time and commitment so many residents give in supporting and helping steer projects on their estate.

“While my goal has always been to improve existing estates and build high quality new council homes, I have always understood the anxieties of people who are concerned about changes to the built environment around them, and have regularly rallied against clumsy development.

“This is partly why I changed the approach of new homes projects to be framed as delivering on a wider estate improvement plan to ensure these projects deliver an uplift in everyone’s living environment, as well as creating structures that give residents a strong and decisive influence over the brief-writing and design process.

“I know well that even with these efforts to engage and involve, we will never win the hearts and minds of all residents affected by every scheme, and I should not have used this Twitter account to challenge alternative views in that way.  I know this is a serious and silly error and I apologise.

“The controversy over my error and resignation doesn’t alter the fact that our borough faces a huge challenge in meeting residents’ housing needs in the midst of a broken housing crisis.

“I’m proud of the progress made under my tenure in cabinet and extremely sorry that it has been cut short by a foolish mistake, but I am confident the council will continue to deliver on our ambitions to improve the lives of all our residents.”

Those to show support for Cllr Pollak, and praise his tenure in cabinet include Labour colleagues such as former council leader Peter John, and readers supportive of projects including the ‘great estates’ programme and infill plans.

One reader wrote in to the News to comment: “I think both sides have a point. More housing is needed for those who need it.

“People talking of ‘littering the landscape’ are callously disregarding the urgent housing needs of many. But green space is so important for residents and costs to the quality of life of existing residents should be kept to a minimum.”

On Twitter, Martin Johnson responded to those who called for the councillors full resignation: “Did Leo make a big mistake? Yes. Had he put his heart and soul into providing extra homes for needy local people? Yes.”

The News understands Cllr Stephanie Cryan has interim responsibility for the housing portfolio until a new cabinet member is appointed.



  1. Unfortunately this Council would like rid of the TRAs who try to hold the Council to account. So I truly appreciate his colleagues supporting him but fear that their reasons for supporting him are they think and feel the same as he does. These councillors support gentrification and we are the victims of their policies which over the last 10 years has included selling off as much of Southwarks assets as possible and squandering the money or allowing property companies to make the profits instead of building homes with the money for their tenants.

  2. It should be understood that this is not about the argument between those championing infill development on housing estate land and those who argue for preservation of existing open spaces. There are legitimate views on both sides of this debate. This is about a councillor and indeed cabinet member who set up a twitter account under a false name pretending to be a concerned local resident attacking those on the open land preservation side of that argument. In other words he was an imposter. Whatever political party you support (for the record I am a Liberal Democrat supporter) do you think it is right for this person to continue as a Borough Councillor?

  3. Cllr. Leo Pollak activities with his Twitter a/c , using it to attack and ridicule residents of estates, prove that he is not a Socialist.
    He should therefore resign as a councillor and as a member of the Labour Party forthwith.

  4. Does one Councillor resigning change the mindset and behaviour of them all because one got caught when it’s always first and foremost about profit, promotion and no accountability what so ever. Us the people they are suppose to represent they treat with utter contempt and will continue to do so not just to push a block of flats through but every aspect of a Councils responsibility they have failed the people and been doing so decades less of course it’s election time it seems when they want to be the best thing since sliced bread promise everyone everything never materialised yet for votes so sorry to say it will only get worse till we the people say enough and do something about it at the ballot box!

  5. He must be sacked and barred from holding any political post, Resignation is for decent people who get a better job/ move away/ or other reasons not involving their disgusting behavior

Comments are closed.

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Michael Peacock on The King of Nunhead
EricEatsPickles on Letters to the editor: 09/11/17
Bermonds03 on Rye Station
WesternApproaches on When The Blitz came to Southwark
WesternApproaches on When The Blitz came to Southwark
WesternApproaches on When The Blitz came to Southwark
Peter Bavington on Letters to the editor: 08/12/16
Darren McCreery on Letters: 25/05/16
Paula Griffin on Letters: 25/05/16
Catherine Stephens on COLUMN: Harriet Harman MP
Terrie Walker Amor on £5k raised for brave Southwark kids
Francis Githaiga on GALLERY: Walworth’s Got Talent!
Charlotté India Péto on TOMMY BLACKMORE: Photos and tributes