Monday, January 17, 2022
spot_img
HomeNewsPoliticsHundreds gather in Peckham to save park from Southwark Council ‘infill’ development

Hundreds gather in Peckham to save park from Southwark Council ‘infill’ development

More than 200 people staged a protest on Peckham Green on Saturday to oppose plans to turn the beloved park into a new housing development.

Last week we detailed how Southwark Council had purchased the formerly privately owned land, once earmarked for a later-shelved tram link, in the 1990s and had long held aspirations to use it for new housing.

In the intervening years the commercial space was given a temporary designation as a park, and has been used by residents as a park ever since.

There are now only days to save the patch of green space nestled near Sumner Road, with hoarding expected to go up in under a week’s time.

In recent weeks the campaign had gathered in momentum, fuelled in part by the growing opposition to ‘infill’ homes within existing estates.

A spokesperson for the Save Peckham Green campaign told the News the event went ‘incredibly well’.

Campaigners ‘occupying’ Peckham Green on Saturday, July 31, 2021

“Just two months ago few people in the borough – let alone the immediate community – knew about this horrendous plan to destroy our public park.

“Now they know. And now we are letting Southwark Council know that we know. We are planning more demonstrations. We are asking residents to communicate to their councillors, MPs, and the local media to demand that Southwark Council stop the planned building on the Green. We do not support direct action in violation of the law.

“We want Southwark to announce that they will not be building on the park, that they will ‘designate’ it a park to protect it forever, and begin to work with the community to make it more available.

“Our community supports public housing but not at the cost of parks. The fight to save Peckham Green has broad support across party lines.

“Greens, LibDems, and even the vast majority of Labour voters are against building on green spaces and specifically against building on Peckham Green.

“The only people who support it seem to be the Southwark Labour councillors and they have circled the wagons.”

Southwark Liberal Democrats have come out against infill developments and last week the local Green Party has said it only supported sensitive developments on brownfield sites; highlighting the environmental imperative for protecting green space and mature trees.

A number of trees are due to be felled as part of the Peckham Green developed, including the ‘twisted tree’, pictured below.

The ‘twisted tree’ (image courtesy of Save Peckham Green)

Last week we asked Southwark Council’s new council housing boss Stephanie Cryan why estates were being given the right to a ballot on regeneration projects but not infill homes.

In a statement, she explained: “I understand the concerns of the campaigners, but there is a difference between large-scale estate regeneration projects where existing social rented homes are demolished and replaced with large numbers of new homes, and our smaller new homes projects.

“The Greater London Authority’s (GLA) criteria for holding ballots on estate regeneration projects applies to any scheme seeking GLA funding that involves the demolition of social rented homes and the construction of 150 or more new homes.

“It is always a difficult decision where to build new council housing, but as a council we have a duty to act in the interests of all residents in Southwark, thousands of whom are living in unsuitable or overcrowded accommodation, many with young children.

“We are in the midst of a national housing crisis, and with more than 15,000 households on our waiting lists, half of these including children, it is absolutely vital we build more council homes.

“With limited space in the borough we are having to be inventive and innovative in where and how we build these essential new homes.

“We work closely with our residents to shape the way we deliver all our new council homes, from site identification through to consultation, design, planning, and delivery.

“Where we are looking at building on existing play areas or open spaces these are being replaced – and often improved – as part of the proposals and residents are given the opportunity to take an active part in shaping the look and feel of new homes and amenities that help make their communities stronger, safer, and more rewarding places to live.”

RELATED ARTICLES

2 COMMENTS

  1. This is an appalling missed opportunity to create an inviting green space in central Peckham and re-think the planning of infill sites.
    Yes we need social housing, and Southwark Council must stop selling of land to developers and ensure that the 35% of social housing in new developments is not later reduced. Southwark has many locations where they should be renewing old stock and returning empty homes to use.
    There’s a whole row of empty derelict houses at Manor Place that Southwark could build social housing on. There’s a huge empty council house on Grosvenor Terrace that has been left to rot. Don’t cut down any more mature trees in the city when we need every single tree to help us breathe in this polluted city. What will happen to the air quality along Peckham Road when you take away this green lung. Stephanie Cryan must be ‘more inventive’ not taking away precious green space. We vote you in we can vote you out.

  2. I know we need to safe the green that we have but there is a housing problem, these people who are protected they have a home but what about all the family that are on the housing list ,dont they deserve a home to and special if they have been on it years ,are all them people that are protected that go home are you saying that people who are waiting shouldn’t have a right to a home ,dont take it out on them but take it out on the mps of Southwark for letting this happen it’s not right ,and the fact that they let private section to say what they can have to re house over 92000 family or the fact that southwark will not let the family who live with family to keep the property on and kicking them out ,so they can give it to some one else know that family may have a disability child in that property is that right,if about other people who ain’t got a home .

Comments are closed.

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Michael Peacock on The King of Nunhead
EricEatsPickles on Letters to the editor: 09/11/17
Bermonds03 on Rye Station
WesternApproaches on When The Blitz came to Southwark
WesternApproaches on When The Blitz came to Southwark
WesternApproaches on When The Blitz came to Southwark
Peter Bavington on Letters to the editor: 08/12/16
Darren McCreery on Letters: 25/05/16
Paula Griffin on Letters: 25/05/16
Catherine Stephens on COLUMN: Harriet Harman MP
Terrie Walker Amor on £5k raised for brave Southwark kids
Francis Githaiga on GALLERY: Walworth’s Got Talent!
Charlotté India Péto on TOMMY BLACKMORE: Photos and tributes