Sunday, January 16, 2022
HomeNewsHousingEmpty homes: 'Only 1.5 per cent of our council housing stock is...

Empty homes: ‘Only 1.5 per cent of our council housing stock is empty at any given time,’ says Southwark’s housing chief

The growing number of empty homes in the borough is one of the biggest flash-points for housing campaigners – including those protesting against ‘infill’ developments in their estates.

People are asking why the council doesn’t just take over empty homes or buy them up, instead of trying to cram more housing into estates designed with light and green space in mind.

One in 24 in Southwark are now ‘empty’, with the number no longer listed as primary residences rising by 600 per cent since lockdown, the largest seen in any London borough; as we reported in late 2020.

The News understands that next month Cryan’s colleague, Darren Merrill, will publish a new strategy for tackling the issue.

However, during our exclusive interview with Cryan last week, she claimed that while important, empty homes are not a panacea for the borough’s chronic housing shortage.

“Seventy-five per cent of empty homes in the borough are privately owned and there is very little we can do about them, we don’t have the powers to just take them over,” she told us.  “We do everything we can do, and are allowed to do, already.”

Empty homes figures are usually a ‘snapshot’ of the number at any given time, and lack insight into why they are empty and how long this is likely to last.

There are around 4,215 in the borough at the latest count considered to be ‘empty’ encompassing homes on the market for sale, being done up, or recently inherited. Some could have gaps between tenants as well as simply being left unused.

At any given point only about 1.5 per cent of the council’s 55,000-strong housing stock are void. In some cases they are properties in need of considerable modernisation.

Others are on regeneration sites and will be repopulated later. Either way, Cryan says, there is no simple fix to house all 16,000 people on the register.

Many of our readers will immediately think of Maydew House – a prime example of apparent waste. Why hasn’t it taken so long to refurbish?

“We needed to take our time to look at what we were doing in Maydew House after Grenfell and do it right,” Cryan explained.

“The asbestos needed to be stripped and we are doing structural surveys at the moment.

“Then COVID happened and that delayed work too so it has taken longer than anticipated to refurbish it.

“We are bringing people back into homes on regeneration sites where possible.

“In Aylesbury we’ve had some homes done up in Brockley House and Wolverton to use as temporary accommodation, whereas it’s harder and harder to keep Taplow and Wendover up to standard so people are coming out of those homes.”



  1. Stephanie crayan article is a load of codswallop! Speak to the people who are telling the truth , southwark council connoting but lie and abuse residents . Tell the truth Stephanie , my article in London live where you slipped up you promised our 8 residents could come back to the proposed build but you didn’t tell them you was only building 2 one bed flats ! Then I caught you out lying what did you do yet and style it out they can come back to the wider estate lol no one beds available on this estate check the article people she lies can’t help herself she a puppet been put in the firing line .

  2. Maydew House will have to be a tear down soon given the length of time the structure has been exposed to the wet weather without protection.

  3. The high waiting list for homes is shocking, as Cllr.Cryan says.
    So, maybe, Southwark should close the waiting list, no more applications until the figure is under control.
    We cannot keep on registering new applicants, so stop now.

  4. this is mad what am reading but i do make one person right with southwark should stop expecting housing application till there rehouse all the family there got on the housing list as this is mad ,i just think southwark counilc all about money then thinking of family,and i dont understand if another family member is living with a older family memeber why should they leave that property knowing there is other family living there ,just to put other family in there ,so there the family was living there just to go into temp accommdation that just dont make any since .

  5. Yeah, exactly. Reduce the eligibility for people on the list. Criminals, and parents of criminals – knife possession, phone snatching, drug dealing, gang activities, etc. – we don’t want you in our community, we don’t want you as neighbours.

Comments are closed.

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Michael Peacock on The King of Nunhead
EricEatsPickles on Letters to the editor: 09/11/17
Bermonds03 on Rye Station
WesternApproaches on When The Blitz came to Southwark
WesternApproaches on When The Blitz came to Southwark
WesternApproaches on When The Blitz came to Southwark
Peter Bavington on Letters to the editor: 08/12/16
Darren McCreery on Letters: 25/05/16
Paula Griffin on Letters: 25/05/16
Catherine Stephens on COLUMN: Harriet Harman MP
Terrie Walker Amor on £5k raised for brave Southwark kids
Francis Githaiga on GALLERY: Walworth’s Got Talent!
Charlotté India Péto on TOMMY BLACKMORE: Photos and tributes