Sunday, January 16, 2022
spot_img
HomeNewsCrimeExclusive: Three more women violently attacked by 'knife-wielding suspect' in East Dulwich...

Exclusive: Three more women violently attacked by ‘knife-wielding suspect’ in East Dulwich after police fail to turn up to 999 call

Three more women were violently attacked in East Dulwich over the weekend after police failed to respond to a 999 call from a woman who was strangled in the street in front of her child.

As the News reported earlier today, a woman was left waiting for a response car that never arrived last Friday night after calling 999 four times. 

She said she had been approached and strangled by a stranger in front of her ten-year-old son shortly before 9pm. 

She reported that the unknown man had attacked her out of the blue on Wood Vale and tried to smash her head against a wall while her distraught child ran to try and find help. 

Speaking to the News she described her fear that her attacker not only remained at large but could go on to attack other women, saying strangulation in particular is a ‘red flag’ for further, escalating violence.

Her attacker was seen remaining in the same area for some time after, but a promised police car never arrived.

Police have now admitted they were unable to race to the scene after dealing with a series of emergencies across the city the same night. 

The victim, who asked to remain anonymous, was eventually told officers would visit three days later, on Monday this week. 

While praising individual officers for their support she criticised their inability to attend on the night and, in particular, she was afraid the attacker would go on to hurt others. 

She told this newspaper: “I called four times that night as no one turned up. Eventually it got to 1.30am and I hadn’t been able to go to sleep.

“I was so tired and they said that someone would come round to my house on Monday. 

“The police could have found him straight away but now there’s not much they can do.”

Sadly, her worst fear has been realised.  Over the weekend reports have circulated that three other women were targeted in exactly the same location, including a knife attack. 

The victim’s injuries were, fortunately, not life-threatening but there is no update on the seriousness of her condition.  Two other women were also threatened with knives in the same three day period. 

Today (June 15) a 53-year-old woman was arrested on suspicion of grievous bodily harm with intent and remains in custody while enquiries continue. 

Police say they believe she is the only suspect, and had initially been mistaken for a man. 

This week the Met launched a new scheme to help reassure women in the aftermath of the kidnap and murder of Sarah Everard. 

Officers from Southwark and Lambeth are holding ‘walk and talk’ events for women to highlight safety concerns and help identify areas which can benefit from more targeted patrols. 

The Met will now have to answer tough questions about whether this is enough if 999 calls go unanswered – and why this suspect was able to go on and commit a string of further horrific offences.

RELATED ARTICLES

9 COMMENTS

  1. When you say “a woman” who was “originally mistaken for a man” is this a the kind of woman who has a penis but who identifies as a woman, or the original kind?

  2. Weird for a woman to attach and strangle other women! Seems like a male crime. And weird that every one of the victims and witnesses identified the attacker as a man!!! Was this accused “woman” who was arrested female? Or a male who identifies as a woman? I find this whole story very confusing.

  3. How can all 4 victims have “mistaken” their attacker for a man? Who’s lying here; the victims or the police? Very concerning.

  4. It sounds like a penis haver’s pattern of behaviour. If the police hadn’t caught the suspect would they be advising local women to look out for a suspicious looking women or a suspicious looking man!!

  5. Public safety bulletins need to include clear, objective identifiers for suspects/perps such as height, weight, sex (not gender), clothes worn, unusual features, mode of transport/ egress. Do not indirectly discriminate against women & other vulnerable protected class persons by not giving them crucial safeguarding data, publishers & public safety personnel !

  6. The witness statement describes the attacker as a male.
    e.g. “The police could have found him straight away ”
    How does arresting a woman make the public feel safe when its clear the perpetrator is male.
    Is this not a travesty of justice?

Comments are closed.

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Michael Peacock on The King of Nunhead
EricEatsPickles on Letters to the editor: 09/11/17
Bermonds03 on Rye Station
WesternApproaches on When The Blitz came to Southwark
WesternApproaches on When The Blitz came to Southwark
WesternApproaches on When The Blitz came to Southwark
Peter Bavington on Letters to the editor: 08/12/16
Darren McCreery on Letters: 25/05/16
Paula Griffin on Letters: 25/05/16
Catherine Stephens on COLUMN: Harriet Harman MP
Terrie Walker Amor on £5k raised for brave Southwark kids
Francis Githaiga on GALLERY: Walworth’s Got Talent!
Charlotté India Péto on TOMMY BLACKMORE: Photos and tributes