Tuesday, December 7, 2021
spot_img
HomeCommentEditorialsRight decision on Lakanal tragedy

Right decision on Lakanal tragedy

It was the right decision for Southwark Council to hold its hands up and plead guilty to all four counts of breach of fire safety regulations, in relation to the tragic Lakanal fire of 2009.

You cannot read back through the events of that day without feeling desperate about the loss of life – three woman and three children, for the agony of their loved ones, and without feeling angry that people were allowed to live in a building where such a catastrophe could unfold. Fighting the charges brought by the London Fire Brigade would have sent out the message that the council believed it was not at fault for those six terrible deaths – which would have been so disrespectful to those who died and their families.

And Southwark hasn’t only just accepted that it made major mistakes – over the past eight years it has spent £62m on fire risk assessment programmes and fire safety work and now works far more closely with the London Fire Brigade. Nothing can bring back those who were lost that day, but this work can help to minimise the chances of it ever happening again.

Southwark will now pay a fine of £270,000, but also court costs of £300,000. Granted, the case had to be prepared and the Fire Brigade’s similar costs paid for, but isn’t it a crazy world where the defendant can plead guilty and yet still pay more in court costs than the actual fine?

Couldn’t a large part of that £300,000 have been better spent, for example on fire safety?


Read the story of the court sentencing here


 

RELATED ARTICLES

2 COMMENTS

  1. “isn’t it a crazy world where the defendant can plead guilty and yet still pay more in court costs than the actual fine?”

    If Southwark hadn’t waited so long before entering that plea, the court costs would have been much lower…

    “over the past eight years it has spent £62m on fire risk assessment programmes and fire safety work”

    Southwark is obliged to carry out those fire safety programmes same as all other social housing landlords: it’s not something ‘above and beyond’ that they have done out of the goodness of their heart…

  2. “isn’t it a crazy world where the defendant can plead guilty and yet still pay more in court costs than the actual fine?”

    If Southwark hadn’t waited so long before entering that plea, the court costs would have been much lower…

    “over the past eight years it has spent £62m on fire risk assessment programmes and fire safety work”

    Southwark
    is obliged to carry out those fire safety programmes same as all other
    social housing landlords: it’s not something ‘above and beyond’ that
    they have done out of the goodness of their heart…

Comments are closed.

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Michael Peacock on The King of Nunhead
EricEatsPickles on Letters to the editor: 09/11/17
Bermonds03 on Rye Station
WesternApproaches on When The Blitz came to Southwark
WesternApproaches on When The Blitz came to Southwark
WesternApproaches on When The Blitz came to Southwark
Peter Bavington on Letters to the editor: 08/12/16
Darren McCreery on Letters: 25/05/16
Paula Griffin on Letters: 25/05/16
Catherine Stephens on COLUMN: Harriet Harman MP
Terrie Walker Amor on £5k raised for brave Southwark kids
Francis Githaiga on GALLERY: Walworth’s Got Talent!
Charlotté India Péto on TOMMY BLACKMORE: Photos and tributes
Jemma Louise Dwyer on Competition: WIN a bike worth £500!
Andy Watts on